Well, yeah, "dial down" the filter. My image prompt was G-rated, for an image that was fine for public advertising in the 1940s, and it would not do it, with no indication what the problem was. I have seen a filter on a few websites that tells the user which words are the issue, which of course helps a lot, but they're still ridiculous, three different sites would not allow the word "baby". Seems like site owners just throw the watchdog program up, and let it roll unchecked. Owners need to pay someone to go through and see what is being flagged and refused and make sure it is only combinations of words that firmly indicate illegal intent. You know how many people call each other baby? Tens of millions. And for example, the word "little", can be used in many ways, and the words "slap" or "smack" and hundreds of others can be too, none of which are illegal. If you're going to put a filter on, you must take the time to adjust it and fine tune it to be as unfiltered as possible, only refusing very specific terms in improper context. Not just randomly filtering words, words like "hit", which are very common and can be used in dozens of different ways.

What is with your moderation filter, seems a little arbitrary, or maybe just turned up to high overall, just like many these days, I'm trying to create an image that is 1000% SFW, and it doesn't give you any clue as to what it could possibly be hung up on. Fun. Are you guys Quakers, or? this isn't "protecting" anyone.