Cain

After more testing came to find this isn’t a very useful generator. Absolutely ridiculous to restrict profanity being used. SMH.

Will do! As I have more of an opportunity, I’d be happy to do more of a deep dive. If I come across any limitations or barriers, I’ll let you know!

So far I don’t have any complaints with the very limited use I’ve had so far. I do intend to really put it through it’s paces (as much as I’m allowed to with the free version) and really do some testing. I am a huge fan and yearly subscriber of Perplexity and use that as my primary AI source so it will be interesting to see how it compares to that beast. I realize it won’t be a fair comparison with a free version vs paid Perplexity but I will give my honest thoughts once I have the opportunity to play around with it more. So far so good!

I’m wondering how/why this was released before it was tested and meets the definition of ready or done.....

Make that price make sense to me.

Unfortunately was not able to test, non-gmail addresses are not accepted.

Prompting needs some major work... I don’t know about this one as is. I think it needs some work to command that pricing structure. I think it’s being done wrong.

I’m not sure if this build is off of the same Bark/Chirp models being used on all of the web-based/Suno type APIs but there doesn’t seem to be any difference between what’s being released by every AI musicgen and this...I love these types of programs but not when everyone and their mom is releasing the same exact stuff. Give us something different if you want to excite us! The vocal remover needs serious work. There are very high pitched artifacts all over the extracted instrumental, basically making it unusable. Definitely not release ready.

It’s okay--nothing state of the art here, doesn’t have features that you won’t find at any of the other cookie cutter music generators. I’m not sure why the pricing models are they way they are but unless you start offering features that you don’t find elsewhere, there is nothing being given here that you can’t find in other builds for less money. We all know this is not sustainable as a subscription model... Anyone smart is going to keep this at a multi-tier level where you pay as you go. THAT is going to be the truly successful model.

Hopefully will get more of a hands on opportunity to truly explore features and options.

I second this! I am starting to see a lot of the same cookie cutter features on a lot of these. Some of them are setting the bar and changing the standard of expectations but the majority are using older Suno builds and copy/pasting outdated code from old repositories. I want more flexibility and customization. If I finally get a really good voice clone, I want to be able to use the same voice again. I want to be able to change melodies and key changes. I want to be able to add harmonies. These are the things that I’m waiting for!!

This is a cool little generator for a quick clip! Could see some potential quick use cases if you needed to generate something with an accent on the fly. Not a bad little tool!

Not bad but it definitely has suffered a bit over the past few months. Pricing is WAY too expensive, it went from $19.9 for 1000 generations to $99 for the same exact package. Not enough control over output, no way to really make "your own" stuff and no justification for the price increase at all since it absolutely DOES rip off Suno's build (this is evident sometimes when too many licenses are being used, EVERYTHING gets Suno tagged and then they go into maintenance to correct the problem.) There are other creation programs coming out, all built on the same engine that have more control and offer more features at a much lower price point. It's not bad for what it is, but no way am I plopping down 5 times the amount it's worth.....sorry guys.