Mini tools| Model | Input | Cached input | Output | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GLM 5.2
This model
Z.ai
|
CNY 8 | CNY 2 | CNY 28 | per 1M tokens |
|
GLM 5.1
Z.ai
|
CNY 6 | CNY 1.3 | CNY 24 | per 1M tokens |
|
GLM 5 Turbo
Z.ai
|
CNY 5 | CNY 1.2 | CNY 22 | per 1M tokens |
|
GLM 5
Z.ai
|
CNY 4 | CNY 1 | CNY 18 | per 1M tokens |
|
GLM 5V Turbo
Z.ai
|
CNY 5 | CNY 1.2 | CNY 22 | per 1M tokens |
|
GLM 4.7
Z.ai
|
CNY 3 | CNY 0.6 | CNY 14 | per 1M tokens |
|
GLM 4.6V
Z.ai
|
CNY 1 | CNY 0.2 | CNY 3 | per 1M tokens |
|
GLM 4.5V
Z.ai
|
CNY 2 | CNY 0.4 | CNY 6 | per 1M tokens |
|
GLM 4.5 Air X
Z.ai
|
CNY 0.8 | CNY 0.16 | CNY 6 | per 1M tokens |
|
GLM 4.6V FlashX
Z.ai
|
CNY 0.15 | CNY 0.03 | CNY 1.5 | per 1M tokens |
|
GLM 4.7 FlashX
Z.ai
|
CNY 0.5 | CNY 0.1 | CNY 3 | per 1M tokens |
|
GLM 4.7 Flash
Z.ai
|
CNY 0 | - | CNY 0 | per 1M tokens |
GLM 5.2
By Z.ai
Model family: GLM
GLM-5.2 is a Z.AI model used in DevPack for high-difficulty scenarios such as complex reasoning and large-scale engineering tasks. Z.AI’s documentation positions the GLM-5 line as a new-generation foundation model family for agentic engineering, with strong coding and agent capabilities, and describes GLM-5.2 as the higher-end option selected for harder development workflows compared with lighter daily-development models.
Overview
GLM-5.2 is Z.AI’s high-capability model for complex reasoning, large-scale engineering, agentic coding, and difficult long-horizon development tasks.
Pricing
Compare GLM 5.2 with other models listed in the same vendor pricing tiers and context lengths.
Standard
About Z.ai
Z.ai (formerly Zhipu AI) is a Chinese AI company developing large language models (GLM series), combining reasoning, coding, and agent capabilities, and offering open models and APIs.
Industry:
Artificial Intelligence
Company Size:
800
Location:
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Website:
chat.z.ai
Benchmark scores
How GLM 5.2 ranks on tracked AI benchmarks. Click any benchmark to see its full leaderboard.
Compare across all benchmarks →Tools using GLM 5.2
-
Open -
Allon🙏 6 karmaJul 16, 2026@AISafe LabsI have used AISAFE a lot for security research involving WordPress plugins and CVE-related submissions through the Wordfence program. Pros: + Great with mapping important parts of codebase and highlighting the areas worth looking into. + Reduces a lot of time spent searching trough bloat unrelated code. + Makes the whole manual testing part a lot easier. + Useful for pentesters, bug bounty hunters or any type of source-code audits. Cons: - Some leads might not be exploitable and manual trimming is still required. Overall AISAFE is a great skill MULTIPLIER for any pentester, it wont replace you but it will make you better at it.
Last updated: July 21, 2026
