Go to section
Sponsor
GitLab Transcend - Intelligent orchestration
Harvard referencing
Featured matches
-
Verify every reference against academic databases in seconds.Open
-

-

Verified tools
-
JB๐ 96 karmaOct 17, 2024@PapersIโve been using it for a month now and I have decided to keep it for a year. There definitely are some kinks they can still work out like file management, but itโs very good at itโs core function: it generally does a good job answering questions and most times identifies PDFs automatically and correctly. The browser plugin works great, and itโs very nice that Papers allows you to add your universityโs library API so you can automatically download PDFs that are accessible through your institution (sometimes it refuses to download some papers, so you just have to downlow it yourself and manually add it). The iPad and Android apps are serviceable. Every once in a while it will mess up the PDF identification, especially with papers from either very old sources or online-only journals. Things they must work on: * A much better system to annotate PDFs (the post-it type notes are cumbersome). * Introduce a notepad attached to each PDF or some way to easily link and save the AIโs output to the PDF. Currently, you have to add a little post it note and then paste the text there. * Keep the AI answers available after closing the documents. If you close the document by mistake or have several open and wish to close some, the ai conversation will be reset. * I REALLY wish that you could get citations and links to where the info was from extracted from PDFs. Currently, I have found Coral.ai does a much better job of showing you where the info came from and it even highlights it for you. Give it a try, their 30-day no credit card needed trial allowed me to truly test it, and now Iโm a yearly subscriber looking forward for new additions and releases.
-
It works great for generating your Thesis/Essay or research papers. The fact that it has in-source citations is what really makes it stand out from the competition. Also great that it has minimal AI detection๐
-
Search real papers and write literature reviews without AI hallucinations.Open
- Sponsor
GitLab Transcend - Intelligent orchestration
-
Great idea, but does not find what you are looking for-about the same as Google Scholar
-
I found AHelp during its ProductHunt launch. Tried its free tools and was quite satisfied. That's why plan to use them often.
-
The tool is posted since 2024-01-04.
-
Open -
OpenI tested the product on my own idea and was really satisfied with the result. The analysis feels structured, professional, and much more grounded than a typical LLM chat. It helped me see both the strengths and weak points of the idea and made me want to run it again with a more thoughtful input. I also liked the detailed AI analysis logging, the debate flow, and the potential/readiness matrix. Even after one run, the product already feels valuable for a founder. With deeper UX/UI and technical development, I can see strong potential in it.
-
Great way to get concrete, organized supervisor-style feedback on papers pre-submission without text generation or ChatGPT-style high-level comments.
-
Very convenient and easy to use!
-
Open
Other tools
-
AI researcher: Questions to literature reviews from 200M+ papers.OpenThis is a great tool for researches like us and our research community, it makes the literature review so easy. all the data is extracted automatically related to our query along with citation. Truly commendable tool and recommendable to those who are not using it till now.
-
After not even ONE try, it asks for Pro. No success, just imo developer hyper-greed. Avoid!
-
easy to pick up and you get a few free file imports. it gives you results pretty fast, unfortunately i can't find a way to get back to these, they're locked behind the paid service.
-
It made my life so easy! It used to take me days sometimes to find the right information, tediously reading through papers to find the relevant data. Epsilon automated the entire process for me. Now, I find the relevant information in just a couple searches
-
It seems to be working fine right now. Maybe try again and double check if youโre using the bookโs original or most recognized title. That might make a difference.
-
Summarize content with AI-powered precision and efficiency.Open
-

