ArXivGPT
Overview
ArXivGPT is a GPT designed to search, analyze, and summarize papers from ArXiv. The functionality of this tool revolves around providing assistance to the user in academic research.
It has the capability to fetch specific papers, carry out comprehensive analyses, and prepare concise summaries based on the paper numbers provided by the users.
It also demonstrates proficiency in comparison tasks, being able to isolate and analyze academic papers that exhibit similar traits. Furthermore, ArXivGPT exhibits the capacity to identify current trends in specific academic fields such as environmental science, as well as highlight the differences or similarities between two academic theories, essentially serving as an academic assistant.
Another significant feature of this tool is that it sends the analyzed summaries directly to the user's email, providing an easy and direct approach to obtain academic insights.
In order to utilize ArXivGPT, users are required to have ChatGPT Plus. The overall goal of ArXivGPT is to assist users in their research, making their tasks easier by providing in-depth academic insights and summaries.
Releases
Top alternatives
-
47,5771,441v1 released 3y agoFree + from $9.99/mo
Ron Jayson🙏 78 karmaMar 1, 2024easy to pick up and you get a few free file imports. it gives you results pretty fast, unfortunately i can't find a way to get back to these, they're locked behind the paid service. -
36,548826v1 released 2y agoFree + from $12.00/moI've tried to find the exact articles via WoS, Google, or Scopus. Despite using a very advised and complicated search query, it was just a waste of time. Perplexity didn't help either. The Jenni AI, which may add useful links when generating text, finds nothing but trash. SciScape gave exactly what I needed from the first query! A couple of fresh relative articles with very exact topics!
-
30,6341,017Released 2y agoFree + from $5/moSuch an impressive platform for all of us who are looking for more efficient ways to do the investigation. OpenRead has the potential to solve our problems.
-
29,079733Released 3y agoFree + from $12/moThink its a fab tool but why wont it allow you to save your workflows?
-
24,602431Released 2y agoNo pricingNot particularly useful and expensive at the same time. Don’t waste your time or money.
-
17,644294Released 1y agoFree + from $4.2/moI’ve been using it for a month now and I have decided to keep it for a year. There definitely are some kinks they can still work out like file management, but it’s very good at it’s core function: it generally does a good job answering questions and most times identifies PDFs automatically and correctly. The browser plugin works great, and it’s very nice that Papers allows you to add your university’s library API so you can automatically download PDFs that are accessible through your institution (sometimes it refuses to download some papers, so you just have to downlow it yourself and manually add it). The iPad and Android apps are serviceable. Every once in a while it will mess up the PDF identification, especially with papers from either very old sources or online-only journals. Things they must work on: * A much better system to annotate PDFs (the post-it type notes are cumbersome). * Introduce a notepad attached to each PDF or some way to easily link and save the AI’s output to the PDF. Currently, you have to add a little post it note and then paste the text there. * Keep the AI answers available after closing the documents. If you close the document by mistake or have several open and wish to close some, the ai conversation will be reset. * I REALLY wish that you could get citations and links to where the info was from extracted from PDFs. Currently, I have found Coral.ai does a much better job of showing you where the info came from and it even highlights it for you. Give it a try, their 30-day no credit card needed trial allowed me to truly test it, and now I’m a yearly subscriber looking forward for new additions and releases.
