TAAFT Tutorial
Generate image
Tasks
Generate text
Free mode
Trending
Leaderboard
Characters
Mini tools
New
Featured
Lists
Agents
Requests
Jobs
Map
Newsletter
Starter pack
Free tools
Speech to text
Text translator
Remove background
Settings
Edit profile
My tools
Gallery
Dashboard
Inbox
Get featured
Contact TAAFT
For you
Popular
Job impact index
Most saved
Affiliate program
Submit AI tool
Notification preferences
Glossary
Home
Timeline
My profile
Create tool
Deals
Companies
Models
Robots
Papers
Fundraises
Repositories
Devices
Organizations
Events
Prompt Pack
Merchendise
APIs
Features
Tools
Countries
Collections
Videos
▼ Latest
No judgement environment
Free mode
100% free
Freemium
Free Trial
Featured matches
-

-

Jon Hillstrom🛠️ 2 tools 🙏 45 karmaMar 6, 2026@JudeGave it a try, before i used to use Calendly and manually tag them as important. Used some trackers on Appstore but this works just as well if not better, really like it! -

-
I am not sure if its working as when I gave the test and post that when I was trying to pay for the results it failed and is not loading the payment page. -

-

-
Know before you build with institutional-grade startup analysis.Open

-

-
Open

-

Verified tools
-
Open
- Sponsor
Tripo AI 3D Generator
-
Nearly every single response from the so called therapist was incomplete. It just stopped mid sentence. I would tell it to finish its thought and it would give me the rest of his previous response. Stupid that you would need to tell it to finish at all. Seriously degrades the experience.
-
Really interesting approach with SquareGen. Quick observation: the product is framed as LLM credit scoring, but lenders don’t buy models — they buy lower default rates. If a lender with a $100M book drops defaults by even 1%, that’s ~$1M saved annually. Positioning around credit loss reduction could massively change the commercial narrative. Happy to share a few thoughts.
-
OpenI tested the product on my own idea and was really satisfied with the result. The analysis feels structured, professional, and much more grounded than a typical LLM chat. It helped me see both the strengths and weak points of the idea and made me want to run it again with a more thoughtful input. I also liked the detailed AI analysis logging, the debate flow, and the potential/readiness matrix. Even after one run, the product already feels valuable for a founder. With deeper UX/UI and technical development, I can see strong potential in it.

