Go to section
Sponsor
MongoDB - Build AI That Scales
🗄️ Database
Sort references alphabetically
Featured matches
-

-
Verify every reference against academic databases in seconds.Open
-
Shivaforai🙏 33 karmaOct 7, 2025@AI Apply by Refer.meI like the concept and the convenience of Refer.me; it gives job seekers like me access to networks I wouldn’t normally have.
Verified tools
-
Open -
Great idea, but does not find what you are looking for-about the same as Google Scholar
-
I’ve been using it for a month now and I have decided to keep it for a year. There definitely are some kinks they can still work out like file management, but it’s very good at it’s core function: it generally does a good job answering questions and most times identifies PDFs automatically and correctly. The browser plugin works great, and it’s very nice that Papers allows you to add your university’s library API so you can automatically download PDFs that are accessible through your institution (sometimes it refuses to download some papers, so you just have to downlow it yourself and manually add it). The iPad and Android apps are serviceable. Every once in a while it will mess up the PDF identification, especially with papers from either very old sources or online-only journals. Things they must work on: * A much better system to annotate PDFs (the post-it type notes are cumbersome). * Introduce a notepad attached to each PDF or some way to easily link and save the AI’s output to the PDF. Currently, you have to add a little post it note and then paste the text there. * Keep the AI answers available after closing the documents. If you close the document by mistake or have several open and wish to close some, the ai conversation will be reset. * I REALLY wish that you could get citations and links to where the info was from extracted from PDFs. Currently, I have found Coral.ai does a much better job of showing you where the info came from and it even highlights it for you. Give it a try, their 30-day no credit card needed trial allowed me to truly test it, and now I’m a yearly subscriber looking forward for new additions and releases.
- Sponsor
MongoDB - Build AI That Scales🗄️ Database -
Search real papers and write literature reviews without AI hallucinations.Open
-
At first glance, this will save me hours of keyword research. I can't wait for the pro plan to be released to get access to more keywords. Much more user-friendly than traditional keyword research tools
-
OpenI tested the product on my own idea and was really satisfied with the result. The analysis feels structured, professional, and much more grounded than a typical LLM chat. It helped me see both the strengths and weak points of the idea and made me want to run it again with a more thoughtful input. I also liked the detailed AI analysis logging, the debate flow, and the potential/readiness matrix. Even after one run, the product already feels valuable for a founder. With deeper UX/UI and technical development, I can see strong potential in it.
-
Historical philosophers debate your business dilemmas and deliver decision frameworksOpenThe idea is cool, doesn't really live up to expectations though. -
It works great for generating your Thesis/Essay or research papers. The fact that it has in-source citations is what really makes it stand out from the competition. Also great that it has minimal AI detection😁
Other tools
-
After not even ONE try, it asks for Pro. No success, just imo developer hyper-greed. Avoid!
-
it got nothing free (absolutely). it only lets you write 300 characters (not words) then asks to pay for the citations. but if your paying, this might be the best one your looking for.
-
AI researcher: Questions to literature reviews from 200M+ papers.OpenThis is a great tool for researches like us and our research community, it makes the literature review so easy. all the data is extracted automatically related to our query along with citation. Truly commendable tool and recommendable to those who are not using it till now.
-
Since there is no feedback possibility on the site, I will leave my comments here. 1. when I put a search term between "" I expect the results to precisely contain this phase, not ...or... 2. the e-mails are called "news summary" so the items should be empty when there is nothing new. Instead, I keep receiving the same search results over and over again. Searching by Google is less time-consuming. 3. there is a 1-day trial period (!) but by the time I discovered the above (day 2) I was hooked for a month. So, de facto, there is no trial period.
-

