Stephen Ocean

Its a step in the right direction, but leaving the user out of the conversation until the AI draws conclusions is not useful. Instead, a kind of interview process should go on, adapting to the current context as needed. Finally, the output is not in a useful format. Some sort of flowchart/mindmap,pitch book would be more useful.

Stupid premise. It needs and interview process, not just a bunch of buttons. And then they want $1,499 for their AI generated business concept. Hubris for sale.

This tool gives a selection of architects to use as inspiration, including Gaudi, which was cool. However, like all the other AI architecture tools I've seen, it lacks imagination. Forget about asking for designs that depart from mainstream presumptions about materials, construction, purposes, etc.

Not ready for prime time. Demo really bad.

The whole thing is really cheesy. Even the intro, which they have complete control of, sounds stilted and fake. The premise is clumsily handled and the Soul Mates are cartoonishly defined. Boo.

Its an interesting concept that needs a better UX. Once the answer tree gets big, its impossible to navigate easily. The UI needs to be able condense and expand branches. It also needs a way to print or share the output.

Another site that I can't even sign up on.

Why should I pay monthly except to make it easy for the publisher? OVERPRICED! Original site generated is too spartan to be useful. Design is super generic. Good idea. Meh execution.

It requires users to choose a preset, which is fine, but it won't accept anything I choose.