-
Jobin Mathew🙏 131 karmaJan 17, 2025@NapkinI recently started using Napkin AI, and I couldn't be more impressed! This tool is incredibly user-friendly and intuitive, making it easy to generate clear visual representations from text. Moreover, the interface is clean and visually appealing, which enhances the overall user experience. Napkin AI is a fantastic companion. Highly recommended for anyone looking to elevate their creative process! -

-

-

-

-

-

-
Says it is completely free yet you only get two messages and then it requires payments of $199 -
like the other person said, you have to pay. Normally, I wouldn't care, but this particular group advertised itself as free for quite some time. A lot of the materials about it still suggest it's free. And then it engages in basically the same pricing structure that people use this tool to protect themselves from. -
Great! I think AI Lawyer is the best service I've ever seen. Perfect use. Prompting helps in the work -

-

-

-
The AI gave me few hints, and after that asked for 9$ payment for full review. I paid and I receive an answer like "We have started to work on the contract and will send the result by email in 12 hours." So as a conclusion can be a SCAM or, let's see if they will send something on 12h... -

-

-

-

-
Open

-
**CONTRATO DE COMPRAVENTA** **PARTE 1: DATOS DE LAS PARTES** * **Vendedor**: [Nombre del vendedor], con domicilio en [domicilio del vendedor], identificado con [identificación del vendedor] (en adelante, "el Vendedor"). * **Comprador**: [Nombre del comprador], con domicilio en [domicilio del comprador], identificado con [identificación del comprador] (en adelante, "el Comprador"). **NOTA**: Es importante que las partes verifiquen la exactitud de los datos proporcionados, ya que estos serán utilizados para la identificación y notificación en virtud de este contrato. **PARTE 2: OBJETO DEL CONTRATO** El objeto del presente contrato es la compraventa de [descripción del bien o servicio objeto de la venta], con las siguientes características: [características del bien o servicio]. **PARTE 3: PRECIO Y FORMA DE PAGO** El precio de venta del objeto del contrato es de [monto del precio]. El Comprador pagará el precio de venta mediante [forma de pago, por ejemplo, transferencia bancaria, cheque, etc.]. **NOTA**: Es recomendable que las partes acuerden una forma de pago clara y definitiva para evitar disputas en el futuro. **PARTE 4: ENTREGA Y RECEPCIÓN** La entrega del objeto del contrato se realizará en [lugar de entrega]. El Comprador recibirá el objeto del contrato en [fecha de entrega]. **PARTE 5: GARANTÍAS Y RESPONSABILIDAD** El Vendedor garantiza que el objeto del contrato no tiene defectos ocultos y se encuentra en buen estado. En caso de defectos o daños, el Comprador podrá ejercer su derecho a la reparación o reemplazo dentro de los [plazo de garantía] días siguientes a la entrega. **NOTA**: Es importante que las partes consideren la inclusión de garantías y responsabilidades claras en el contrato para proteger sus intereses. **PARTE 6: CONDICIONES GENERALES** * El presente contrato se regirá e interpretará de acuerdo con las leyes del [jurisdicción aplicable]. * El incumplimiento de cualquiera de las disposiciones del presente contrato dará lugar a la responsabilidad correspondiente. * Las partes acuerdan que cualquier disputa o controversia surgida en virtud del presente contrato será resuelta a través de [mecanismo de solución de conflictos, por ejemplo, arbitraje, mediación, etc.]. **PARTE 7: ACUERDO DE LAS PARTES** Ambas partes han leído y aceptado las condiciones establecidas en el presente contrato. Las partes comprometen a cumplir con las obligaciones y responsabilidades establecidas en este contrato. Fecha de firma: [fecha de firma] Firma del Vendedor: ________________________________________________________ Firma del Comprador: ________________________________________________________ **NOTA**: Es recomendable que las partes conserven copias del contrato firmado y que lo revisen cuidadosamente antes de firmarlo. Espero que este contrato de compraventa sea de ayuda. Recuerde que es importante revisarlo cuidadosamente y considerar la asesoría de un abogado antes de firmarlo.
-
Loved that it can draft any legal doc without a pre-configured template -

-
AI-powered legal document generator for effortless accuracy.OpenHere is a suggested draft for a legal affidavit or statement regarding your involvement in the alleged theft. This document should be reviewed by a qualified attorney to ensure it meets your specific needs and complies with local laws. --- **AFFIDAVIT OF NON-INVOLVEMENT AND UNKNOWING ASSISTANCE** I, [Your Full Name], residing at [Your Address], hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the following statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1. **Background**: On or about [Date], I was asked by [Name of Person Who Requested Help] to assist in transporting equipment using my truck. At the time, I was unaware of any illegal activity or that the equipment in question was allegedly stolen. 2. **Lack of Knowledge**: I had no knowledge, involvement, or participation in any theft or unlawful activity related to the equipment. I acted in good faith, believing that the request for assistance was lawful and legitimate. 3. **Assistance Provided**: My sole involvement was limited to driving my truck to help transport the equipment. I did not inquire about the ownership or origin of the equipment, as I had no reason to suspect any wrongdoing. 4. **Cooperation**: I am fully willing to cooperate with any investigation or legal proceedings related to this matter to clarify my role and demonstrate my lack of involvement in any illegal activity. 5. **Statement from Reporting Party**: [Name of Person Who Reported Equipment Stolen] has reviewed this affidavit and acknowledges that I was unaware of the circumstances surrounding the alleged theft. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signed this [Day] of [Month], [Year]. _________________________ [Your Full Name] Witness: _________________________ [Witness Name] **ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY REPORTING PARTY** I, [Name of Person Who Reported Equipment Stolen], residing at [Address], hereby acknowledge that [Your Full Name] was unaware of the circumstances surrounding the alleged theft of the equipment. I confirm that [Your Full Name] acted in good faith and had no involvement in any illegal activity related to this matter. Signed this [Day] of [Month], [Year]. _________________________ [Name of Person Who Reported Equipment Stolen] Witness: _________________________ [Witness Name] --- **Important Notes**: 1. This document should be signed in the presence of a notary public to ensure its validity. 2. Consult with an attorney to ensure this document is appropriate for your situation and jurisdiction. 3. Keep a copy of this affidavit for your records. Let me know if you need further assistance! -
Craft comprehensive legal documents for all parties.Open**MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS** **Case No. 2023-CV-001** **Introduction** This Memorandum of Law is submitted in support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and therefore, this Court should dismiss the action as a matter of law. **Background** On January 1, 2022, Plaintiff, a consumer, purchased a product from Defendant, a manufacturer, which allegedly caused injury to Plaintiff. Plaintiff filed a Complaint on February 1, 2023, alleging negligence, strict liability, and breach of warranty. Defendant moves to dismiss the Complaint for failure to plead sufficient facts to establish a prima facie case. **Arguments** I. **Negligence Claim** Plaintiff's negligence claim fails to plead a duty of care, breach, and causation. Under [State] law, a plaintiff must allege specific facts demonstrating that the defendant owed a duty of care, breached that duty, and that the breach proximately caused the plaintiff's injury. (_Smith v. Jones_, 123 [State] App. 456, 459 (2020)). Plaintiff's Complaint merely asserts that Defendant was negligent without providing any factual basis for this claim. Therefore, this Court should dismiss the negligence claim. II. **Strict Liability Claim** Plaintiff's strict liability claim is also deficient. To establish a strict liability claim, a plaintiff must plead that the product was defective, the defect caused the injury, and the defendant was in the chain of distribution. (_Johnson v. XYZ Corp._, 234 [State] 123, 127 (2015)). Plaintiff's Complaint fails to allege any specific defect in the product, and therefore, this claim should be dismissed. III. **Breach of Warranty Claim** Plaintiff's breach of warranty claim is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Under [State] law, a breach of warranty claim must be brought within four years from the date of delivery of the product. (_Roe v. Doe_, 345 [State] 789, 792 (2020)). Since Plaintiff purchased the product on January 1, 2022, and filed the Complaint on February 1, 2023, the claim is time-barred. **Legal Precedents** * _Smith v. Jones_, 123 [State] App. 456, 459 (2020) (holding that a plaintiff must allege specific facts to establish a prima facie case of negligence) * _Johnson v. XYZ Corp._, 234 [State] 123, 127 (2015) (holding that a plaintiff must plead a specific defect to establish a strict liability claim) * _Roe v. Doe_, 345 [State] 789, 792 (2020) (holding that a breach of warranty claim must be brought within four years from the date of delivery of the product) **Potential Counterarguments and Responses** * Plaintiff may argue that the Complaint should not be dismissed because it alleges a "good faith" effort to comply with the pleading requirements. Response: This argument is without merit, as the pleading standard requires more than a "good faith" effort. The Complaint must plead sufficient facts to establish a prima facie case. * Plaintiff may argue that the Court should grant leave to amend the Complaint. Response: Leave to amend should be denied because Plaintiff has had sufficient opportunity to plead a valid claim, and any amendment would be futile. **Conclusion** In conclusion, Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss should be granted as a matter of law. The Complaint's negligence, strict liability, and breach of warranty claims are all deficient and should be dismissed. Respectfully submitted, [Your Name] [Your Title] [Your Law Firm] References: * Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) * [State] Statutes and Regulations * _Smith v. Jones_, 123 [State] App. 456, 459 (2020) * _Johnson v. XYZ Corp._, 234 [State] 123, 127 (2015) * _Roe v. Doe_, 345 [State] 789, 792 (2020) Note: This is a sample document, and you should adjust it according to your specific case scenario, facts, and applicable laws. -

-

-
Easy to implement into my workflow and helps save time reviewing and drafting various legal documents -

-
Very suprised about this tool. I like the design and the output. Looking forward to the upcoming developments -

-
Open
-

-
**Crime de Prevaricação** O crime de prevaricação é previsto no art. 319 do Código Penal Brasileiro (Decreto-Lei nº 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940) e é definido como: "Retardar ou deixar de praticar, indevidamente, ato de ofício, ou praticá-lo contra disposição expressa de lei, para satisfazer interesse ou sentimento pessoal." Em outras palavras, o crime de prevaricação ocorre quando um servidor público, no exercício de suas funções, deixa de realizar um ato que lhe compete ou o faz de forma contrária à lei, com o objetivo de beneficiar alguém ou satisfazer um interesse pessoal. Essa conduta criminosa é punida com pena de detenção, de três meses a um ano, e multa. **Histórico** O crime de prevaricação foi introduzido no Código Penal Brasileiro em 1940, com a promulgação do Decreto-Lei nº 2.848, que consolidou a legislação penal brasileira. No entanto, a figura do crime de prevaricação já estava presente no Código Criminal do Império, de 1830, e no Código Penal da República, de 1890. ** jurisprudência** A jurisprudência brasileira tem consolidado o entendimento de que o crime de prevaricação exige a comprovação de que o servidor público agiu de forma dolosa, ou seja, com a intenção de beneficiar alguém ou satisfazer um interesse pessoal. Além disso, é necessário que haja uma relação de causalidade entre a conduta do servidor e o dano ou perigo causado à administração pública. **Fontes** * Código Penal Brasileiro (Decreto-Lei nº 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940) * Código Criminal do Império (Lei nº 38, de 18 de setembro de 1830) * Código Penal da República (Decreto nº 847, de 11 de outubro de 1890) * Jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal e do Superior Tribunal de Justiça.
-










