Test automation 2023-12-03
QA.tech icon

QA.tech

No ratings
4
Our AI tests your web apps and creates bug reports loved by developers.
Generated by ChatGPT

QA.tech offers an AI-driven solution aimed at improving the quality of software through automated quality assurance (QA) testing. The AI tool is designed to test web applications, creating comprehensive bug reports useful for developers.

The testing process involves a continual scan of your site to create a detailed understanding of the web application and how users interact with it. From this, the QA testing agent identifies actions and objectives, which form the basis of the tests that would be set up by the users using their own credentials and data.

As the tests are run as part of your development pipeline, the AI agent carries out steps to meet test objectives while multiple personas monitor varying defects' severity.

The tests work in a similar fashion as manual testing conducted in a browser, providing immediate feedback. The AI also adapts dynamically to any changes on the site.

Evaluation is made through detailed, actionable insights and developer-friendly bug reports which include console logs, network requests, among others, and can be exported to Linear, Jira, Clickup, etc., for further assessments.

These processes allow developers to spend less time on testing and more on building new features, saving money on manual QA, reducing potential production bugs, thereby enhancing the product's quality and reducing the risk of customer loss due to bugs.

Save

Would you recommend QA.tech?

Help other people by letting them know if this AI was useful.

Post

Feature requests

Are you looking for a specific feature that's not present in QA.tech?
QA.tech was manually vetted by our editorial team and was first featured on April 27th 2024.
Promote this AI Claim this AI

6 alternatives to QA.tech for Test automation

Pros and Cons

Pros

Automated QA testing
Comprehensive bug reports
Continual site scan
Identifies actions, objectives
Part of development pipeline
Monitors defects' severity
Experiences like manual testing
Provides immediate feedback
Adapts dynamically
Detailed actionable insights
Developer-friendly bug reports
Includes console logs, network requests
Exportable to other tools
Less time on testing
Cost-saving on manual QA
Reduces production bugs
Improves product's quality
Reduces customer loss risk
Tests based on user's credentials
Tests include user's data
Discovers new features automatically
Real-time test updates
Easily configurable tests
Comments on your pull requests
Replays tests for debugging
Instant notifications in messaging apps
Debugging includes console logs, network requests
Prevents churn due to bugs
Increases software development cycle speed
Improves software quality
Improves customer experience
Continuous web applications testing
Use of multiple personas
Presents varying defects' severity
Detailed understanding of web applications
Understands how users interact
Saves developer's time
Prevents support strain due to bugs
Seamlessly fits in the CI/CD pipeline

Cons

No mobile application testing
Reliance on user-provided credentials
No cross-browser testing mentioned
Lack of customization explained
No direct tool-user interaction
Testing depends on development pipeline
Not clarifying support for offline applications
Limited export options
Unclear multiple personas concept

Q&A

What is QA.tech?
What does QA.tech provide?
How does QA.tech work?
Does QA.tech test web applications only?
How does QA.tech’s AI adapt to changes?
What kind of feedback does QA.tech provide?
What are bug reports and how does QA.tech present them?
How does QA.tech integrate in the development pipeline?
What makes QA.tech better than traditional manual testing?
How does QA.tech contribute to productivity enhancement?
Can I customize the tests on QA.tech?
Who sets up the tests performed by QA.tech?
What does QA.tech mean by 'continuous scanning' of my site?
Do I need any specific credentials or data for QA.tech testing?
How do the bug reports from QA.tech help developers?
Do I need to manually handle the bug reports generated by QA.tech?
Can bug reports be exported from QA.tech to other platforms?
How does QA.tech's dynamic adaptation work?
Does QA.tech provide instant notifications during testing?
Does QA.tech have any impact on the risk of customer loss due to bugs?

Help

⌘ + D bookmark this site for future reference
⌘ + ↑/↓ go to top/bottom
⌘ + ←/β†’ sort chronologically/alphabetically
↑↓←→ navigation
Enter open selected entry in new tab
⇧ + Enter open selected entry in new tab
⇧ + ↑/↓ expand/collapse list
/ focus search
Esc remove focus from search
A-Z go to letter (when A-Z sorting is enabled)
+ submit an entry
? toggle help menu
βœ•
0 AIs selected
Clear selection
#
Name
Task