14,923
AI content detection
2024-06-17
GLTR
11
By unverified author. Claim this AI
A tool to detect automatically generated text.
Overview
AI content detection#34 most recent
Most popular alternative: GPTKit (214 saves)
View all 41 alternatives
Recommendations
Generated by ChatGPT
GLTR (Giant Language model Test Room) is a forensic tool for detecting automatically generated text from large language models. It works by inspecting the 'visual footprint' of the said text and helping predict if an automatic system generated the content.
GLTR uses the same models responsible for generating the text to identify if the text has been artificially produced. It primarily functions with the GPT-2 117M language model from OpenAI, employing large language models to analyze textual input and evaluate what GPT-2 might have predicted at each position.
The tool provides a colored overlay mask to illustrate the likelihood of each word being used under the model. The colors range from green for most likely (top 10 words) to purple for least likely words.
The tool consists of histograms to aggregate the information related to the whole text, indicating the ratio between the top predicted word and subsequent word, and demonstrating the distribution over the uncertainties of the predictions.
While GLTR is efficient, its revelations are somewhat alarming, highlighting the ease with which AI could produce forged text, thereby underscoring the need for more robust, discerning detection mechanisms.
How would you rate GLTR?
Help other people by letting them know if this AI was useful.
Post
Feature requests
Are you looking for a specific feature that's not present in GLTR?
💡 Request a feature
GLTR was manually vetted by our editorial team and was first featured on April 10th 2023.
41 alternatives to GLTR for AI content detection
-
214 -
1391 -
115 -
39 -
381 -
34 -
34 -
291 -
Use our free AI detector to analyze and score text.284 -
28 -
27 -
25 -
Boost your site's credibility with Aithenticate, bringing transparency to AI content.23 -
22 -
22 -
211 -
Ensure the authenticity and originality of your digital content.20 -
19 -
191 -
17 -
16 -
Discover WriteHuman's AI Detector: distinguishing between AI-generated and human-written text.14 -
12 -
11 -
101 -
10 -
9 -
81 -
7 -
6 -
5 -
4 -
4 -
3 -
3 -
Write with confidence and bypass AI detection with BypassDetection.3 -
214 -
2 -
1 -
1 -
1
Pros and Cons
Pros
HarvardNLP collaboration
Forensic text analysis
Detects artificially generated text
Analyzes output of GPT-2 117M
Ranks words based on likelihood
Visual display of result
Highlights most likely words
Three aggregate histograms
Accessible live demo
Source code on Github
Nominated for best demo
Detects fake reviews
Analyzes text comments
Uncovers artificial news articles
Works with large language models
Evaluates GPT-2 predictions
Color-coded word likelihoods
Differs unlikely and likely predictions
Analyzes ratio between predictions
Visualizes entropy distribution
Provides robust detection
Validated by academic paper
Detects model's self-generated text
Allows user experimentation
Integrates with APIs
Open source software
Forensic language processing
Cyber-security application
Visual representation of data
In-depth text analysis
Supports large text input
Provides top 5 predictions
Analyses word prediction distribution
Displays prediction uncertainties
Visual analysis of sample texts
Flexible input mechanism
Overlay colored mask representation
Detects text too likely human
Analyzes uncertainty of predictions
Evaluates word rank positioning
Visual footprint inspection
Adapts to automatic input
Analyzes scientific abstracts
Visualizes generated vs real text
Evaluates word-wise text generation
Accessible via online demo
Communicate with developers via Twitter
Citable research work associated
Cons
Limited scale detection
Requires advanced language knowledge
Assumes simple sampling scheme
Valid only for GPT-2
Limited to text analysis
Dependent on color differentiation
No text-analysis customization options
Dependent on model's word ranking
No training for different models
Q&A
What is GLTR?
GLTR, or Giant Language model Test Room, is an analytical tool developed for detecting automatically generated text. It primarily operates by examining the 'visual footprint' of the text and assists in ascertaining whether an automatic system has generated the content.
Who developed GLTR?
GLTR was developed by a joint venture between the MIT-IBM Watson AI lab and HarvardNLP.
How does GLTR detect automatically generated text?
GLTR detects automatically generated text by analyzing how likely it is a language model has produced the text. It uses language models like GPT-2 117M language model from OpenAI to analyze textual input and predict what GPT-2 might have generated at each position. It also presents a colored mask overlay to represent the probablility of each word being used based on the model.
What is the role of the GPT-2 117M language model in GLTR?
The GPT-2 117M language model plays a key role in GLTR's operations. GLTR analyzes textual input and evaluates what GPT-2 might have predicted at each position, which helps in determining whether a text has been artificially generated.
How does GLTR visually analyze text output?
GLTR visually examines the output via colored word overlays and histograms. Each word is ranked according to the likelihood of its production by the GPT-2 language model, with different colors representing varying degrees of likelihood. The histograms aggregate information regarding word likeliness, prediction ratio between top predicted word and next word, and prediction entropy distribution across the analyzed text.
What do the different color highlights in GLTR represent?
The different color highlights represent the varying degrees of likelihood of words being produced by the language model. Words within the top 10 most likely words are highlighted in green, those within the top 100 are in yellow, and those within the top 1,000 are in red. All other words are in purple.
What is the significance of the histograms in GLTR?
The histograms in GLTR amplify the detection process by aggregating entire text information. The first histogram shows the count of each category of words in the text. The second illustrates the ratio between the probabilities of the top predicted word and subsequent word. The third displays the distribution across the probability entropies of the predictions. This combined insight supports the evidence of whether a text has been machine-generated.
Can GLTR be used to detect fake reviews and news articles?
Yes, GLTR can be used to detect fake reviews, comments, and news articles that have been artificially generated by substantial language models.
How can I access GLTR?
GLTR is accessible to users through a live demo.
Is the source code for GLTR available?
Yes, the source code for GLTR is open-source and accessible on Github.
What is the 'visual footprint' that GLTR uses for detecting generated text?
The 'visual footprint' that GLTR uses for detecting generated text comprises a colored overlay mask that indicates the probability of each word given its position in the text, suggests how likely each word was predicted by the language model.
What does the colored overlay mask in GLTR indicate?
The colored overlay mask in GLTR provides a direct visual indication of how likely a word was predicted under the model. Words ranked within the top 10, 100, and 1,000 most likely words are highlighted in green, yellow, and red, respectively. The remaining words are highlighted in purple.
How does GLTR provide additional evidence of artificially generated text?
GLTR provides additional evidence of artificially generated text by showcasing three histograms related to the whole text. These graphs denote how many words of each category appear in the text, the ratio between the probabilities of the top predicted word and the next word, and the distribution over the prediction entropies. These insights collectively provide a stronger, more conclusive signal of synthetic text.
Are there limitations to the effectiveness of GLTR?
While GLTR offers advanced forensic text analysis capabilities, there are limitations to its effectiveness. It works best on an individual text basis, and might struggle to automatically detect large-scale language model hobbyism. Furthermore, its performance largely depends on the user's comprehensive understanding of the language in question to evaluate whether an unusual word makes sense in a given context.
How does GLTR use large language models to analyze textual input?
GLTR uses large language models, such as the GPT-2 117M from OpenAI, to examine textual input and gauge what the language model might have predicted at each position. Its methodology involves using the same language models that are used to generate fake text to also detect it. This way, the tool can sort the words according to their likelihood of being produced by the model, providing crucial insights into whether a text was artificially generated.
How can GLTR help in cyber security and AI ethics?
GLTR contributes to cyber security and AI ethics by providing a way to detect automatically generated text, which can be used maliciously to generate fake reviews, comments, or news articles. By identifying whether a text has been artificially generated, it becomes easier to uncover potential misinformation or manipulation attempts, thereby promoting transparency and ethical use of AI in textual data applications.
How does GLTR rank words according to their likelihood of being produced by a language model?
GLTR ranks words based on their likelihood of being generated by a language model. This is achieved by comparing textual input with predictions from the GPT-2. Words that are most likely to be generated by the model are ranked higher and highlighted in various colors depending upon their ranking - green for the most likely (top 10), followed by yellow and red, while the rest are highlighted in purple.
What happens when you hover over a word in the GLTR display?
When you hover over a word in the GLTR display, a small box presents the top 5 predicted words, their associated probabilities, as well as the rank of the succeeding word. This exercise gives further insights into what the model might have predicted.
What does GLTR mean by 'too likely' to be from a human writer?
'Too likely' to be from a human writer, as per GLTR, refers to the hypothesis that computer generated text often adheres to highly probable words at each position, which makes the text appear convincingly human authored. Conversely, natural human writing exhibits a higher frequency of unpredictable yet contextually appropriate words, that make the content less likely to be computer generated.
How does GLTR use the uncertainties of predictions in its analysis?
GLTR employs prediction uncertainties in its analysis to understand the model's confidence in each prediction. Uncertainties are obtainable from the language model's entropy, which is then used to construct one of GLTR's histograms. Lower uncertainty signifies the model had strong confidence in a particular prediction, whereas higher uncertainty suggests a lack of confidence. Observing this can offer further insights to distinguish human-written text from machine-generated ones.
If you liked GLTR
Featured matches
Other matches
Home
Search
My saved AIs
Free signup
Just Launched
Featured
Popular
Requests
Tasks
Timeline
Job Impact Index
Forum
Newsletter
Submit / Advertise
Join the biggest AI community
Subscribe to our exclusive newsletter, coming out 3 times per week with the latest AI tools. Join over 470,000 readers.
Help
⌘ + D bookmark this site for future reference
⌘ + ↑/↓ go to top/bottom
⌘ + ←/→ sort chronologically/alphabetically
↑↓←→ navigation
Enter open selected entry in new tab
⇧ + Enter open selected entry in new tab
⇧ + ↑/↓ expand/collapse list
/ focus search
Esc remove focus from search
A-Z go to letter (when A-Z sorting is enabled)
+ submit an entry
? toggle help menu
Sign in to continue (100% free)
To prevent spam, some actions require being signed in. It's free and only takes a few seconds.
Sign in with Google
0 AIs selected
Clear selection
#
Name
Task